Azmed

By Azmed
· France
Azmed — Fracture / effusion / dislocation detection, bone-age and osteoarticular measurement, chest imaging.
Diagnostic
Radiology
Production
CE Marked FDA Cleared
Regulatory status
CE Marked FDA Cleared
Deployment
Production
Clinical role
Adjunct (decision support)
Headquarters
France
AI type
Diagnostic

Precise indication

Fracture / effusion / dislocation detection, bone-age and osteoarticular measurement, chest imaging.

Regulatory status

CE Class IIa (MDR 2017/745, EU) and FDA Class II 510(k) (US), both confirmed. Shortlisted by NICE’s Early Value Assessment (UK) — not yet a formal clinical recommendation.

Clinical evidence

Vendor-supported

Vendor content on azmed.co.

Independent

Independent prospective study (Technical University of Munich, 2025, 1,037 patients / 2,926 radiographs) comparing Azmed, Gleamer and Radiobotics: AUC 84.9% (all fractures), 61.9% (dislocations), 58.0% (effusions). Conclusion: adjunct tools, not a replacement for the radiologist.

Real-world deployment

No exact figure found, but NICE shortlisting suggests active NHS interest.

Interoperability

European status

Editorial verdict

Limits and uncertainties

Weaker and more heterogeneous performance on complex scenarios (dislocations, effusions) than on simple fractures; NICE assessment is not yet a definitive clinical recommendation.

Sources

https://www.azmed.co/ ; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41066829/

This profile is not medical advice or an endorsement. Hospitals should perform their own due diligence (regulatory compliance, GDPR, cybersecurity, integration, local clinical validation). How we evaluate

At a glance
Vendor
Azmed
Headquarters
France
AI type
Diagnostic
Specialty
Clinical role
Adjunct (decision support)
CE marking
Notified body
EU AI Act
Data hosting
Last verified
Reviewed by
How we evaluate

Every profile documents the precise indication, regulatory status, vendor-supported and independent evidence, real-world deployment, limits and dated sources.

A independent systematic review or prospective multicentre study · B at least one independent peer-reviewed study · C peer-reviewed, vendor-supported · D vendor claims only.

Read the methodology →

Spotted an error?

Vendors, authors and clinicians can request a correction. Corrections are dated on the profile.